Ford Motor Co. (IW 500/3) revealed its emission testing could be flawed and took pains to soothe anxiety among investors in an industry wracked by years of pollution scandals.
Ford said workers raised concerns about its testing in September, and it’s since hired an outside firm to help conduct an investigation that could stretch into the summer. Along with the unidentified firm and regulators, the company will look into how it’s used road-load specifications to simulate how aerodynamic drag and tire friction can affect fuel economy outside testing labs.
By speaking up Thursday, even before sorting out just how big a dilemma it faces, Ford managed to keep shareholders relatively calm. An initial stock swoon following the disclosure gave way to a tempered drop. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency also signaled it’s pleased the company stepped forward voluntarily.
The mea culpa was a far cry from Volkswagen AG’s handling of its so-called dieselgate scandal, which has haunted the German giant for years and cost it upwards of $32 billion. Whereas VW’s diesel engines were deliberately designed to skirt emissions rules, it’s too early to say whether Ford was intentionally gaming the system. Ford is also fessing up, while VW stonewalled environmental regulators for months.
“It seems as if Ford is trying to nip this in the bud,” said Michelle Krebs, senior analyst for car-shopping researcher Autotrader. “It wasn’t brought to Ford’s attention by outsiders or consumers, it was discovered by employees and, to their credit, they listened to them.”
Ford said it hasn’t yet found that any of its fuel-economy ratings are inaccurate. Although the company already is evaluating potential changes to its road-load modeling process, it’s distancing itself from VW. The Dearborn, Michigan-based carmaker said its concerns don’t involve so-called defeat devices used to cheat emissions tests.
“Everyone treats the subject of emissions testing very delicately because of what happened at VW,” said Jessica Caldwell, executive director of auto industry analysis at researcher Edmunds.
While Ford shares fell as much as 3.3% after its disclosure, they were down 0.2% later in trading after the market close.
“It has been a long and deep discovery process,” Kim Pittel, Ford’s group vice president of sustainability, environment and safety engineering, said in an interview. “At this time, there’s been no determination that we have an issue with our fuel-economy labels or our emissions certification. It’s too early in the investigation to say that.”
The EPA said Ford informed the agency on Monday and briefed the regulator on its initial findings the following day.
“The investigation is ongoing and the information too incomplete for EPA to reach any conclusions,” Michael Abboud, an agency spokesman, said by email. “We take the potential issues seriously and are following up with the company to fully understand the circumstances behind this disclosure.”
The EPA intends to determine whether the discrepancies Ford discovered were widespread or isolated, an agency official briefed on the matter said. The regulator is taking the matter seriously, and Ford’s voluntary disclosure was seen as positive, the official said.
The California Air Resources Board, which played a major role in unearthing VW’s scandal, had no immediate comment. David Clegern, a spokesman, said by email the regulator hadn’t heard from Ford as of Thursday, contradicting the company’s statement that it shared its concerns with the regulator this week.
Environmental and consumer-advocacy groups were quick to condemn Ford, which made its announcement the same day the White House said it was cutting off talks with California over future fuel-economy standards.
Ford was among the carmakers that asked President Donald Trump to reopen a review of rules set by the Obama administration, which helped set in motion an escalating series of policy clashes between Washington and Sacramento.
“It’s shameful that Ford waited months to disclose issues with its emissions testing,” the environmental groups Sierra Club and Public Citizen said in a joint statement. “These actions are only magnified by the company’s attempts to undo and weaken the current emissions standards. After repeated cheating scandals and failure to comply with clean-air safeguards, the auto industry has proven that it cannot be trusted to act in the public’s interest.”
Ford has had fuel-economy issues before. It restated ratings on six models, including the Fiesta, C-Max and Fusion hybrid cars, in 2014 and cut checks for as much as $1,050 to more than 200,000 owners to compensate for their vehicles’ mileage shortcomings.
Now, the first model Ford is evaluating as part of its certification-process review is the 2019 Ranger pickup, which went on sale early this year.
“I’m not too worried about it for now, at least,” David Whiston, an analyst with Morningstar Inc., said by phone. “For investors, I don’t think there’s anything to do at this point. You just have to stay tuned for more information.”
By Keith Naughton and Chester Dawson