Rising tides may lift boats, but they can sink airplanes. According to the 2014 National Climate Assessment, 13 of the country’s 47 largest airports have at least one runway that’s vulnerable to moderate or high storm surge. Along with San Francisco and its across-the-bay buddy Oakland International, these include the New York area trio of Kennedy, LaGuardia, and Newark. Boston’s Logan and Philadelphia International are at risk, as are Washington, DC’s Reagan and Honolulu International. The waters pose a threat to airports in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Miami, New Orleans, and San Juan, Puerto Rico. It’s not that the waters will come up and swallow these places the way an incoming tide swallows a sandcastle—at least not this century. Rather, the higher water levels will exacerbate the effects of storms, making floods more common and damaging.The list of threatened airports is long because coastal areas make for good places to put planes: They tend to be flat and low-lying, and their bodies of water provide lots of open space for arriving and departing aircraft. But as climate change takes hold—spurred on by the emissions that jet aircraft pump into the atmosphere—that convenience has become a vulnerability. And though airports have long been aware of that shift, the pummeling that Superstorm Sandy dealt to New York City in 2012 made clear the severity of the problem. Water overtook LaGuardia’s runways and damaged electrical infrastructure, forcing a three-day closure that cost millions.
Want the latest news on aviation in your inbox? Sign up here !
Like most problems posed by a shifting climate, the fixes are neither easy nor cheap . The obvious option is to keep the water out. That’s the goal of SFO's seawall. Oakland's airport plans to fortify and raise by 2 feet the 4.5-mile dike that separates its main runway and terminals from the bay. That should cover it until 2050, for $46 million.
LEARN MOREThe WIRED Guide to Climate Change Airports are packed with guts passengers rarely see or think about, none of which do well in floods. These include electrical systems, plumbing lines, telecoms, mechanics like air intakes, ventilation fans and ducts, medical and safety supplies, smoke and fire alarms, record storage, and hazardous materials such as jet fuel and chemicals. To protect such facilities, the Massachusetts Port Authority, which oversees Boston's Logan, issued a floodproofing design guide in 2014 that called for a mix of “dry” and “wet” approaches. Dry floodproofing means keeping the water out altogether, using things like flood barriers in doorways and staircases, and using aquarium glass that can hold back a wave of H2O. The wet way allows more water in, but ensures that all vulnerable infrastructure is well above the point it will reach. For existing facilities, Massport set that point at 13.7 feet above sea level, projected to keep it dry until 2030. New facilities will have to meet the 2070 height of 17 feet.
Balneario Camboriu view from the bay with partial watershed © Timm Kroeger/TNC In the first rigorous, peer-reviewed study on water fund Return on Investment (ROI) for cities in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest, TNC scientists examine the Camboriú Water Fund and show that nature can be a cost-effective solution for improving urban water supplies and reducing treatment costs.