Reproduction is messy. The genetic swaps and recombinations that occur when gametes merge don't always happen perfectly. Babies don't arrive when scheduled . Even preventing reproduction can be complicated, as anyone who has ever wrestled with birth control can attest.
That said, It’s arguably a better time than ever to have a baby. Prospective parents struggling with infertility can turn to IVF, or sperm and egg donation. But as the egg donor industry grows more sophisticated, the donors themselves are sometimes kept in the dark. Once a person becomes pregnant, they can take advantage of the extraordinary advancements in noninvasive prenatal testing to screen for chromosomal abnormalities and genetic mutations—but then, what actually happens to the mountains of genetic information these tests generate?
Or maybe it’s the worst time to have a kid. Mounting societal concerns—political upheaval, climate change, the general crushing financial and psychic toll children impose—make procreating seem like a spectacularly bad idea. People who opt to go #childfree certainly think so. And still-high prematurity rates, especially among minorities, show that science alone can’t solve every problem.
Andrea Valdez is the editor of Wired.com.
Over the next few days, WIRED will publish a collection of stories that examine this fundamental aspect of all living (and some non-living) things: how we reproduce. We’ll cover everything from attempts to use big data to reduce premature births to the best fertility apps and sex toys. Oh, and totally-not-scary self-reproducing robots ? We’ll have those for you too.
How We Reproduce
- How Big Data Could Help Prevent Premature Births
- You Know What Else Can Reproduce Now? Robots
- Gadgets and Gear for Making (or Not Making) Babies
Coming later this week:
- The Tricky Ethics of New, Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
- Childfree on Reddit—Because Apocalypse, That's Why
- Inside the Secret Facebook Egg Donation Groups
- The New Science of Male Contraception
But neither company has done much to address the persuasive design of those apps, or help people move beyond what was already possible to do by manually changing a few settings in your phone.In other words, Google and Apple used the banner of "digital wellness" to re-package tools that already existed, without changing much of anything about your phone."Time Well Spent was never about giving users features to set time limits on their phones, it was about changing the game from which companies compete," says Harris.