I never have.Attitudes toward Silicon Valley have changed a lot since the last presidential election, maybe nowhere more than in Washington, DC. The past few years have seen tech executives file into the nation’s capital to atone for their companies’ sins: Russian interference , Cambridge Analytica , the Christchurch massacre , and much more . The piling up of ghastly episodes punctured the myth of Big Tech’s unerring wisdom and benevolence. It really seemed like 2020 could be the year when the “techlash” became a campaign issue. Andrew Yang’s improbable run was originally about addressing the threat of job automation. Elizabeth Warren, who has been criticizing monopolistic corporations for years, trained her fire on Silicon Valley early last year with an audacious plan to break up Big Tech , a call that Bernie Sanders joined. Meanwhile, Warren’s billionaire foil Mike Bloomberg, who made his fortune founding a tech company of his own , dismissed her ideas, suggesting she and Sanders didn’t “know what they’re talking about.” For a minute there, it was possible to imagine the candidates duking it out onstage about platform monopolies and big data.
That doesn’t seem too likely anymore. The Yang campaign died in Iowa, with the candidate moving on to CNN pundit heaven. Warren and Bloomberg both dropped out this week after poor showings on Super Tuesday. The race is down to Sanders and Joe Biden, two nearly-80-year-old men who seem more likely to do battle over the past—votes on the Iraq War and trade deals, fond words for Communist leaders, BFF moments with Barack Obama—than on the future of digital platform regulation.Why hasn’t regulating Big Tech caught on more? The simplest answer is that voters have other concerns. Most Big Tech companies remain wildly popular, as a recent poll by the Verge found. The same poll did find large shares of Americans in favor of aggressive regulation: For example, a slight majority said Google and YouTube should be split up. But there’s a difference between being in favor of something and prioritizing it. Most Americans care a lot more about issues like health care and the economy than what to do about Silicon Valley. And any successful politician knows not to waste time talking about something voters don’t care about. (This is the reason climate change has struggled to become a major electoral issue, even though most Americans support action.)
That’s not to say tech issues aren’t on the ballot this year. While Warren may have been the standard-bearer, Sanders has proven to be a serious antagonist of the biggest firms in his own right. In 2018, the threat of his STOP BEZOS Act nudged Amazon to impose a $15 minimum wage for its workers. More recently, he has proposed breaking up cable conglomerates like Comcast and Time Warner as part of a plan to lower the cost of internet access. Biden, however, has been quiet on tech matters, other than telling the editorial board of The New York Times that internet platforms’ immunity under the Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act should be “immediately revoked.” (Biden’s pique may have had something to do with a misleading Trump ad that had recently been making the rounds on Facebook and YouTube.)
Congressman Jerry Nadler of New York has already begun to prepare his Judiciary Committee, under the leadership of David Cicilline of Rhode Island, to probe anti-competitive consolidation in the tech industry, building on Nadler’s earlier observation that companies like Facebook “cannot be trusted” to regulate themselves.