YouTube Will Police Political Videos More Closely

As the 2020 election begins in earnest with Monday’s Iowa caucuses, YouTube is cracking down on election-related disinformation in an attempt to protect users. Google’s video-sharing site has long had policies barring deceptive practices and engagement manipulation, but in a blog post on Monday, the company specified that the rules would also apply to a number of popular political conspiracy theories that have plagued the platform for much of the past decade.So-called “birther” videos that argue “a candidate is not eligible to hold office based on false information about citizenship status requirements to hold office in that country” will no longer be permitted, YouTube noted, in a clear nod to the outsized role the platform played in advancing conspiracy theories about former president Barack Obama’s citizenship status in 2008 and 2012. (Prominent proponents included Donald Trump, who made headlines in 2012 with a YouTube video calling for Obama to release additional records to verify his citizenship.)

READ ALSO:
YouTube Is Banning Extremist Videos. Will It Work?
YouTube is changing its hate speech policy to more effectively police extremist content, a move targeting the legions of neo-Nazis, conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, and other bigots that long have used the platform to spread their toxic ideologies.

YouTube said it will also bar videos that have been manipulated or doctored to deceive users, including content that “has been technically manipulated to make it appear that a government official is dead.” That rule would have removed videos supporting conspiracy theories such as one that took root last year suggesting that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was secretly dead.

LEARN MORE

The WIRED Guide to Conspiracy Theories It’s a sign that YouTube is doubling down on its comparatively aggressive stance on political misinformation at a time when its social media bedfellows have attracted criticism for their hesitance to do the same. Last May, when a misleading, doctored video of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi began making the rounds on social media, YouTube, notably, was the first major platform to take it down, while Facebook, contentiously, chose to leave it up.

READ ALSO:
The Secret to Success on YouTube? Kids

The two sites also diverge on their approach to lies by political figures. Facebook has said it will not remove ads by politicians, even when they contain untruths. YouTube doesn’t permit politicians to blatantly lie in ads, though it does allow for the occasional “political hyperbole” so long as it doesn’t significantly undermine trust in democracy, the company noted in December. Both companies say they will prohibit content that spreads misinformation about the upcoming census or voting processes .

READ ALSO:
YouTube Continues to Fail Its Queer Creators

YouTube took a page from Twitter—which banned political ads outright last October—when it announced in December that it would no longer allow campaigns to micro-target voters with political ads. Despite calls from critics, Facebook has yet to do the same.

Mark Warner takes on Big Tech and Russian spies
Chris Evans goes to Washington
The fractured future of browser privacy
I thought my kids were dying. They just had croup
How to buy used gear on eBay—the smart, safe way
👁 The secret history of facial recognition . Plus, the latest news on AI
🏃🏽‍♀️ Want the best tools to get healthy? Check out our Gear team’s picks for the best fitness trackers , running gear (including shoes and socks ), and best headphones

SIMILAR ARTICLES:

YouTube Will Police Political Videos More Closely

The article source: www.wired.com